Food Policy Council Newsletters
Food Policy Council Newsletters
Sign Up for Our Newsletter
Choose the newsletters you want to get.
Green Umbrella members also have access to our members-only newsletters and e-blasts. Join today to receive these perks!
Greater Cincinnati 2030 District Newsletters
Greater Cincinnati 2030 District Digest Archive
Sign Up for Our Newsletter
Choose the newsletters you want to get.
Green Umbrella members also have access to our members-only newsletters and e-blasts. Join today to receive these perks!
The Common Orchard Project Newsletters
The Common Orchard Project Newsletters
Sign Up for Our Newsletter
Choose the newsletters you want to get.
Green Umbrella members also have access to our members-only newsletters and e-blasts. Join today to receive these perks!
Greenspace Alliance Newsletters
Greenspace Alliance Newsletters
Sign Up for Our Newsletter
Choose the newsletters you want to get.
Green Umbrella members also have access to our members-only newsletters and e-blasts. Join today to receive these perks!
The Impacts of Cincinnati Public Schools’ Commitment to “Good Food”
Cincinnati Public Schools (CPS) made a groundbreaking commitment to transform its food purchasing practices by adopting the Good Food Purchasing Policy (GFPP) nearly a decade ago. We’re deep-diving into the numbers through an analysis of the impacts of this decision.
– Kristine Cahall-Dosch, Farm to School Consultant
Why Deep Dive into the Numbers?
CPS is the only institution in Ohio and only 1 of 13 in the US to have formally adopted GFPP. Local purchasing is one of the key values of the policy, which makes CPS fertile ground to evaluate a question that surfaced in a meeting of the Greater Cincinnati Regional Food Policy Council (GRCPC) Institutions Committee: “How does all this actually help our farmers?”
With that question we realized seeing direct, concrete impacts of institutional purchasing choices needed to be examined. And so, this case study to evaluate the economic impacts of CPS purchasing was born.
Cincinnati Public Schools and GFPP

In 2017, the School Nutrition Program at CPS began its journey of conscious food purchasing by committing to the GFPP. The GCRFPC was a coalition member in a group of advocates who sought to bring GFPP to Cincinnati. The final say in adopting the program was the CPS school board and school nutrition staff with CPS Student Dining Services Director, Jessica Shelly, leading the charge to establish district wide change.
Adoption of this policy requires third party audits of participating organizations based on five core purchasing principles all couched within a context of equity, accountability, and transparency:
- Local and community-based economies
- Environmental sustainability
- Valued workforce
- Animal welfare
- Community health and nutrition
Put simply, CPS voluntarily enrolled in a program that would review and grade their efforts to purchase food that is produced locally, is environmentally friendly, considers the ethical treatment of employees and animals, meets certain nutritional standards, and comes from businesses that value transparency/equity. The results of this decision required the development of new supplier relationships, endless conversations about shifting needs, constant evaluation to improvement, and an enormous amount of reporting taken on by the CPS Manager of Nutrition, Lauren Marlow.
Methods

Public school nutrition programs receive funding from the Department of Defense Fresh Fruits and Vegetables Program and the USDA National School Lunch Program, composed of a formal contract distributor and micropurchasing of $10,000 or less. Sales represented in the case study span a four-year period of purchasing data from fall 2020 to fall 2024 of USDA funded procurement due to accessibility of detailed records.
What Chefs Want has been the awarded bid recipient of CPS food distribution for 5 years. As part of their contract, What Chefs Want works to secure growers who are not only within a 250 mile radius of CPS, but also meet other components of GFPP guidelines for ethical purchasing. They source from places like Lobenstein Farm, a small family operation 45 minutes away from Cincinnati; Kentucky Fresh Harvest, a sustainable greenhouse operation; and Riehm Produce Farm in Tiffin, Ohio, to name a few.
Both grains and dairy were self-reported in totals by CPS. Grains are purchased from Klosterman Bakery (4 miles from CPS central offices) and they use Indiana grown grains. Milk is purchased from Reiter Dairy (which sources from farms within 150 miles). Fresh fruits and vegetables, along with value-added products like salsa and yogurt through the What Chefs Want contract, were collected through a combination of line item purchasing reports that were distilled by Green Umbrella staff.
The Impact
CPS purchased from 14 producers within 100 miles, which amounts to a drive from Cincinnati to Lexington or Columbus. Using the GCRFPC Greenhouse Gas Emissions Calculator, it’s estimated that purchases on local produce alone saved 46,079.44 tons CO₂-eq in energy, the equivalent of eliminating nearly 6 homes’ yearly energy use.
Nearly $34,000 has been spent with Certified Organic produce that goes straight to the school lunch line.
The case study shows over a 4-year period, CPS’ commitment to values-based purchasing has resulted in $6.9 million dollars spent with farmers and producers in the region.This $6.9 million, spent within a 250 mile radius of Cincinnati, had the potential to generate an additional $3.3 million activity in the Ohio, Kentucky, and Indiana economies.
CPS averages an 18% spend annually on local foods, but during the pandemic, that number spiked to 52% in “a real, honest-to-goodness community effort” to consciously support local businesses that lost sales due to Covid-19, according to CPS Student Dining Services Director Jessica Shelly.
The Advocate They Didn’t Have to Be
These impacts aren’t a result of mandates or requirements.
Adopting GFPP was a completely voluntary action on the part of CPS board members and nutrition staff with the support of a community coalition. They actively chose to become advocates through action for a values-based food system. Certainly, the additional audits and reporting requirements of GFPP aren’t easy, but CPS is investing in our local economy, community, and students’ nutrition. They are mindfully making decisions to use their budget in a way that benefits the larger community.
Consider how you can advocate for change within your organization(s). CPS has pioneered the way in the Cincinnati region and can be a great example to emulate. If you’re interested in learning more about how your organization can improve their purchasing practices, visit the GCRFPC website here.
More Information & Resources
- Guidebook for Resilient Regional Food Systems through Your Organization
- The Center for Good Food Purchasing
- Cincinnati Public Schools Student Dining Program
- Cincinnati Public Schools Adapts Good Food Purchasing Program
- Local Food Connection – What Chefs Want
- Lobenstein Farms
- Kentucky Fresh Harvest
- Riehm Farm
- Green Umbrella Food Policy Council
- Green Umbrella Food Policy Council: Food Systems Circularity Series
Sources
https://goodfoodpurchasing.org/good-food-values/
https://news.d.umn.edu/articles/expert-alert-economic-impact-shopping-local
Green Schoolyards Action Network Newsletters
Green Schoolyards Action Network Newsletters
Sign Up for Our Newsletter
Choose the newsletters you want to get.
Green Umbrella members also have access to our members-only newsletters and e-blasts. Join today to receive these perks!
“Don’t Drink the Cancer Water”: Forever Chemicals and Cover-Ups Coming to the Surface
Contributors: Kelly St Charles
Tap water. Organic tomatoes. Your – yes, your – blood and tissue. What do these all have in common?
They’re places where PFAS – aka “forever chemicals” – can be found. And that’s just the beginning. From the soil in your garden to the deepest parts of the ocean, from the polar ice caps to human placenta, PFAS have polluted the entire – yes, entire – planet.
But what are PFAS, really? How did they get everywhere without us noticing? And what does this mean for our health?
Forever Chemicals Are Forever
PFAS is short for per- and/or polyfluoroalkyl chemicals1. There are thousands of substances in this family of chemicals, but they all have a carbon-fluorine bond in common. Carbon-fluorine bonds are among the strongest chemical bonds known to exist. They do not degrade at all in the natural environment, so they move and linger throughout the world in water, wind, soil, and living organisms (like humans), accumulating over time.
Carbon-fluorine bonds are extremely rare in nature; however, they are extremely common in the man-made chemical industry because they have a huge commercial value: they resist grease, oil, water, and heat. Take a moment to look around you – look at the furniture, a snack or drink you’re enjoying, even the clothes you’re wearing – is anything waterproof or fire-resistant? Plastic? Polyester? You’re sitting on, drinking from, maybe even wearing PFAS.
Your Health & PFAS
Studies about the impacts of PFAS exposure/ingestion are ongoing, but they have been linked to an enormous amount of health conditions, including but not limited to:
- Cancers (kidney, testicular, breast, prostrate, bladder, ovarian, thyroid, blood, and more)
- Childhood leukemia
- Decreased fertility, lower sperm count, lower testosterone, hormonal disruption, menstruation irregularities, and endometriosis
- Pregnancy-induced hypertension (preeclampsia), lower birth weights, and birth defects
- Development impairment, behavioral changes, and delayed puberty in children
- High cholesterol levels
- Liver damage
- Weakened immune systems
The more PFAS you accumulate in the body, the more at risk you are. Because children drink more water, eat more food, and breathe more air per pound of body weight than adults, they have a higher risk of ingesting PFAS than adults. This includes newborn babies, who can ingest PFAS through formula or breast milk. Even fetuses are exposed to PFAS, which can travel through the body and have been found in the placenta.
People who work in industries that manufacture, develop, or utilize PFAS are at a significantly higher risk of health impacts associated with PFAS. For example, inhaling polymer fumes can cause “Teflon fever”, flu-like symptoms that can last for a few hours or even days in only one incident2. It may sound like something that only shows up in industrial plants or factories, but it can occur anywhere people work closely with plastics and other petroleum products. For example, a 2010 study of professional ski technicians in Norway revealed that the ski waxes they used, many of which contained PFAS, were exposing the employees to high levels of PFAS3.
Even if you don’t work in an industry that regularly handles PFAS, you are at an increased risk of exposure if you reside near someplace that does. That’s how the public started to find out about PFAS – people who lived in areas where PFAS were developed and disposed of improperly started to get sick, and it was traced back to devastating PFAS contamination in water supplies. That’s how the public started to find out PFAS were dangerous. But the manufacturers of PFAS already knew.
From the Manhattan Project to West Virginia4
Teflon was accidentally invented in 1938 by chemist Roy Plunkett at a DuPont laboratory in Deepwater, New Jersey. DuPont is a chemical manufacturing company that first began as a gunpowder manufacturer in the 1800’s. Over the years, they worked on explosives, lacquers, and artificial textiles like Rayon before concentrating on chemical development, which led to things like artificial rubber (Neoprene), synthetic ammonia, and Freon, a refrigerant.
Plunkett was working with Freon when he noticed a white buildup in one of his gas canisters. The material didn’t melt, dissolve, or react to anything chemically, and it was extremely slippery. DuPont patented it as Teflon. It was used during World War II by the military for nose cones for bombs and canister lining, and it was instrumental in the Manhattan Project – the successful production of the hydrogen bomb.
During Manhattan Project development, the areas where DuPont processed fluorocarbons – the building blocks of Teflon and all PFAS – were known to cause health issues to workers. In the Deepwater plant, two people died after Teflon by-products were emptied into a ventilating hood. Around DuPont’s Chamber Works Plant in southeastern New Jersey, farms were devastated by an unknown contagion that bewildered the farmers. Crops failed, animals sickened, and farm workers were sick. This was in 1943.
After the war, DuPont and other chemical manufacturers found commercial ways to profit from the inventions they developed for violence. Poison gases became pesticides, explosives became chemical fertilizers, vinyl became medical equipment, flooring, and Saran wrap. Teflon was used for things like fishing gear and waterproofing raincoats, but DuPont hadn’t started marketing it for food products yet because their safety testing was yielding concerning results. Workers who inhaled Teflon fumes developed flu-like symptoms. Lab animals that were exposed to heated Teflon died within minutes. While at-home cooking wasn’t likely to heat the Teflon to the point where fumes would fill a kitchen, the possible liability made DuPont nervous.
In the 1950s, a French engineer coated his wife’s baking tins with Teflon to prevent food from sticking to the sides. It worked so well that he started a non-stick pan company, which did extremely well in France. Meanwhile, in America, people outside the chemical manufacturing industry were starting to notice the impacts of chemical waste around production sites, even if they didn’t know what specifically was causing the destruction. Lawyers, scientists, and government officials put pressure on Congress to regulate synthetic chemicals and food additives entering the consumer market. The pressure worked, sort of – Congress passed a law that required testing for all new chemicals that might wind up in food. New chemicals – meaning the chemicals that were already in commercial use, like Teflon and other PFAS, were to be presumed “safe” and exempted from required testing5.
When an American entrepreneur encountered the French Teflon-lined pans, he approached DuPont to import the pans to the United States. Despite DuPont’s earlier reluctance to use Teflon directly with food, by this point the new food additives bill had passed through Congress, and no additional testing of their chemicals would be required6. DuPont moved forward with marketing Teflon as a cooking miracle.
Teflon was an instant consumer hit, but DuPont still didn’t know why it made workers sick. As its non-stick properties made kitchen tools fly off the shelves, DuPont continued internal safety testing, and discovered that a specific chemical in Teflon, PFOA7, was toxic, causing abnormally large livers and kidneys in lab animals. There was no recall, no public announcement, no change to the product. And there was still waste created from Teflon production, which DuPont dumped into the Ohio River and unlined pits around its plant in Parkersburg, West Virginia.
The Secret Poisoning of a Town
Robert Bilott was a corporate defense lawyer based in Cincinnati, often working on the side of chemical companies, when Wilbur Tennant came to him for help. The Tennants were from Parkersburg, West Virginia, where they owned a small farm that had sustained their family for generations. In 1983, they sold some acreage to the local DuPont plant for a landfill. The Tennants were reluctant at first, but DuPont promised only to dump nontoxic materials, and the family needed the money.
By 1990, the farm was dying. The once-clear creek turned black and foamy. Cattle started growing tumors, going blind, and throwing up blood. Members of the Tennant family had chemical burns and breathing problems. The Tennants alerted the West Virginia Department of Environmental Protection, which found that DuPont was improperly disposing of waste on the landfill acreage next to the Tennants’ farm. The agency fined DuPont and moved on. As the years passed, animals kept dying, and the Tennants decided to sue DuPont. On the advice of a neighbor, they contacted Robert Bilott, the grandson of an acquaintance.
Bilott was so disturbed by the material Wilbur showed him – including images of foamy creeks, lesion-covered cows with deformed hooves, a dead calf with chemical-blue eyes – that he decided to take the case. Bilott’s work uncovered intentional concealment on the part of DuPont to both silence the Tennant family’s complaints and hide the dangers they knew came with PFOA, which was found in Parkersburg’s and neighboring towns’ drinking water supply. 70,000 people were drinking contaminated water for decades.
PFAS on the Big Screen

Bilott’s work with the Tennant family and the case against DuPont are dramatized in the 2019 film Dark Waters, which starred Mark Ruffalo as Robert Bilott and Anne Hathaway as Bilott’s wife, Sarah. Mark Ruffalo is himself an environmental activist, and he joined Bilott in the award-winning documentary How to Poison a Planet, which premiered in the United States in 2025. How to Poison a Planet includes sworn testimony from industry scientists and employees discussing what chemical company 3M knew about the dangers of PFAS, even as 3M continued to sell them around the world. “This documentary exposes one of the biggest environmental disasters in human history. Without a concerted effort from all levels of business and government, ongoing contamination will continue to endanger the environment and our health,” says Ruffalo.
Green Umbrella hosted a screening of How to Poison a Planet on July 15, 2025, at Cincinnati World Cinema. Following the screening, Robert Bilott was in conversation with Chris Lorentz, Ohio River Basin Alliance chair, and Jeff Swertfeger, Greater Cincinnati Water Works Superintendent of the Water Quality and Treatment Division. This event was sponsored by Taft Law (special thanks to Cincinnati World Cinema for donating ticket sales to Green Umbrella).
While it touches on PFAS in general, How to Poison a Planet focuses on two specific instances of PFAS contamination that have decimated communities: the First Nations Community of Wreck Bay in Australia and the town of Oakdale, Minnesota.

Firefighting foams are made from and packed with PFAS. For more than three decades, Australia’s Department of Defence used 3M’s firefighting foams on their HMAS Creswell naval base and the Jervis Bay Range Facility, which neighbor Wreck Bay. The PFAS in the foam contaminated the waters of Wreck Bay, causing cancer clusters and destroying the Indigenous residents’ relationship to the land. Indigenous Senator Lidia Thorpe, chair of an Australian Senate inquiry into the Wreck Bay contamination, said many members of the Wreck Bay community have “some type of illness related to PFAS, or they’ve lost family members to PFAS … We’re talking about children with rare cancers, we’re talking about eye cancers, we’re talking about breast cancers, and the community is completely devastated.” In How to Poison a Planet, a Wreck Bay resident said that people in the community don’t grow old. A January 2025 article from Australia’s ABC News quoted Wreck Bay resident Henry Simms as saying “I haven’t got one mate out there my age left – a lot of them men died in their early 40s.”
Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing – the original name of 3M – started dumping PFAS waste in Oakdale, Minnesota decades ago. The waste leached into the area’s groundwater, contaminating the drinking water for over 140,000 residents. In 2005, state health officials announced publicly that 3M had contaminated the water. Tartan High School is located in one of the toxic groundwater zones. So many students had cancer, the students joked about the school water fountains to each other: “Don’t drink the 3M cancer water”. Oakdale residents recruited Rob Bilott to help with a lawsuit against 3M, but Minnesota’s laws are different than West Virginia’s, and 3M is extremely influential in Minnesota; lawyers weren’t permitted to discuss whether or not 3M chemicals are harmful, and a jury ruled in 3M’s favor in 2009. In 2010, the state of Minnesota sued 3M for polluting the state’s natural resources. 3M settled the state’s lawsuit in 2018 for $850 million.
What Now?
In 2004, DuPont settled Bilott’s class-action lawsuit in Parkersburg – which grew to include 80,000 plaintiffs across 6 water districts – for $343 million. Wilbur Tennant and his wife both died before the lawsuit was settled, as did other plaintiffs. Lawsuits continue to bubble up against DuPont and its fellow chemical companies, both for sickening people and covering up the damage they’ve done.

The Oakdale community in Minnesota – in particular a Tartan High School student, Amara Strande – lobbied hard for the laws to be changed to regulate 3M’s chemicals more effectively. Amara’s Law, which takes effect in stages between 2025 and 2032, prohibits the sales of products containing intentionally added PFAS in Minnesota, except for those determined to involve currently unavoidable uses of PFAS. Amara died of cancer in 2023, before she got to see the law named after her enacted. She was 20 years old.
While chemicals companies across the globe are phasing out certain PFAS that have been specifically identified as toxic (such as PFOA), these companies – and industry regulations – are not changing the development methods of carbon-fluorine bonded chemicals: as in, “create first, find out if it’s dangerous later”. For example, short-chain PFAS were developed as an alternative to the original PFAS substances. Short-chain PFAS have fewer fluorinated carbons and so were thought to accumulate less in the environment and living things. However, because they are shorter, they’re highly mobile in soil and water, making it easier for them to spread and contaminate drinking water, and they linger just like the original, long-chain PFAS do.
The New House Bill Targeting the Clean Water Act
On June 11, 2025, the House of Representatives’ Committee on Transportation & Infrastructure introduced the H.R.3898 Promoting Efficient Review for Modern Infrastructure Today (PERMIT) Act, which is described as “cutting red tape” and “increasing Clean Water Act permitting efficiency”. In practice, the bill would limit the scope of the Clean Water Act by redefining “navigable” waters to exclude waste treatment systems, areas where waters overflow because of precipitation, converted croplands, groundwater, or any other body of water determined to be excluded by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. In other words, the Clean Water Act – which requires regulation of dumping into and polluting of water sources – would no longer apply to any of the above water systems. This means that any company, entity, or person could dump how much of whatever pollutant they wanted into those water systems and not only would they not be fined, the public might never know.
The Committee on Transportation & Infrastructure released a statement listing several industry leaders as supporters of the PERMIT Act. These entities include pesticide companies, building and manufacturing associations, the National Mining Association, and the Fertilizer Institute.
Mike Collins, a Republican from Georgia’s 10th Congressional District, is the Primary Sponsor, with 8 fellow Republicans as Co-Sponsors:
- Sam Graves (Committee Chairman), Missouri’s 6th District
- Eric “Rick” Crawford, Arkansas’s 1st District
- Doug LaMalfa, California’s 1st District
- Jeff Hurd, Colorado’s 3rd District
- David Taylor, Ohio’s 2nd District
- David Rouzer, North Carolina’s 7th District
- Clarence “Burgess” Owens, Utah’s 4th District
- Pete Stauber, Minnesota’s 8th District
History Is Now
It’s been less than a hundred years since chemical companies began developing PFAS for the commercial market. Yet we’re still learning how damaging PFAS are to the environment and human health. We’re still uncovering the cover-ups within DuPont, 3M, and other chemical companies on how deep their knowledge of the danger ran. And we still don’t know how to effectively get PFAS out of the environment or our bodies. Thanks to the courage of victims like the Tennant family, the Wreck Bay community, and Amara Strande; the tenacity of lawyers like Rob Bilott; and the veracity of journalists like Carrie Fellner, Michael Hawthorne, Sharon Lerner, and Mariah Blake, the lawsuits aren’t going away.
More Information & Resources
Change for Yourself
Because there are thousands of PFAS chemicals, and because they have been found everywhere in the world, it can feel like an overwhelming problem to address, especially as an individual trying to protect themselves and their loved ones. First, stay calm – don’t let yourself be daunted by the scope and scale of the problem. Start with small things that reduce your PFAS exposure, things that feel manageable for your family. You can add more changes as your habits adjust. Since PFAS accumulate, any change you make, however small, can be impactful over time.
Steps you can take to reduce PFAS exposure for yourself and your household:
- Dust more. PFAS accumulates easily in dust around the home.
- Check your closet for non-natural or water-resistant fabrics. When buying new clothes, choose all-natural fabrics like cotton, linen, and wool.
- When purchasing new furniture, curtains, or pillows, avoid fire-treated and water-resistant fabrics. Performance fabrics are almost always treated with PFAS. Choose natural materials like leather, cotton velvet, canvas, linen, and cotton.
- Check your kitchen for Teflon, non-stick, and plastic cookware and bakeware. Throw out any non-stick tools, pans, and tins that are chipped, scratched, or damaged; these leach PFAS directly into food, especially when heated. When purchasing new cooking tools, choose carbon or stainless steel, cast iron, ceramic, and wooden materials.
- Avoid single-use plastic packaging for food including water- and grease-proof wrappings, casings, and containers. Replace saran wrap with natural beeswax wraps and plastic water bottles with glass or stainless steel.
- Avoid food designed to be heated or cooked in the container it is sold in. Microwave popcorn bags, frozen meals served or covered in plastic, even “steamable” frozen vegetable bags are all made with and from PFAS.
- Check product labels of your home cleaning and personal care products. Whenever you can, avoid products that have ingredients with “-fluoro-” somewhere in its name; those are PFAS. Some products that include PFAS may come as a surprise, including:
- Dishwasher and laundry detergent pods (the plastic that holds the pods together are designed to melt in water are PFAS that linger in the water supply and on dishes or clothes)
- Waterproof mascara and other waterproof cosmetics
- Pads, tampons, and menstrual cups
- Dental floss
- Learn more about your home’s water supply. Have well water tested; check with your water provider on the results of their water quality testing, which should happen regularly. Most water providers post water quality results on their websites. If you’re not satisfied with your water quality, you can install water filtration systems. These range from full-supply filtration systems for your entire house to simple filtered water pitchers that can sit in your refrigerator.
Changing the System
The influence and resources of powerful chemical and manufacturing companies meant that they could – and did – stack the deck in their favor, for decades. The regulatory, legal, and political systems set up now are ones that the companies helped build, but that doesn’t mean they can’t be changed. The changes made already have been because ordinary people spoke up and stood out. If you want systems change in regards to PFAS laws and regulation, you can engage with your elected officials at local, state, and national levels to make sure they know it’s an issue that you, a constituent, care deeply about.
You can also engage with the National Environmental Protection Agency directly. The EPA publishes regulation proposals in the Federal Register (the U.S. government’s daily journal) and you can provide comments before they are enacted. You can comment on existing EPA regulations as well at Regulations.gov. Learn more about interacting directly with the EPA here.
Engage with your local soil and water conservation districts. Many municipalities have specific entities dedicated to the health and safety of the community’s earth and waters. Green Umbrella’s Greenspace Alliance recently released a guide to contacting your representatives that also includes a section on soil and water conservation districts in Greater Cincinnati. Learn more and access the guide here.
Talk to your friends, family, neighbors, and network about your concerns about PFAS. Despite the proliferation of PFAS, many people are still unfamiliar with them. The more your community knows about PFAS and its potential for harm, the more prepared you’ll be to protect yourself from existing PFAS contamination, recognize if it happens even further, and speak up to defend your waters, health, and home.
Sources
- They Poisoned the World: Life and Death in the Age of Forever Chemicals by Mariah Blake
- How to Poison a Planet directed by Katrina McGowan
- Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances (PFAS), U.S. Food & Drug Administration
- Yale Experts Explain PFAS ‘Forever Chemicals’, Yale Office of Sustainability
- Study shows higher risk of childhood leukemia tied to PFAS exposure from household dust, Berkeley Public Health
- Teflon Flu, poison.org
- Polymer Fume Fever, National Library of Medicine
- The Lawyer Who Became DuPont’s Worst Nightmare, New York Times
- Short-chain perfluoroalkyl acids: environmental concerns and a regulatory strategy under REACH, National Library of Medicine
- H.R. 3898 PERMIT Act
- Clean Water Act (1972)
- Mark Ruffalo on the ‘evil’ company that poisoned every person on the planet – then kept it secret, The Sydney Morning Herald
- Social and cultural impacts: Wreck Bay case study, Parliament of Australia
- Wreck Bay: NSW Indigenous community secures $22m Pfas contamination settlement, The Guardian
- Paradise poisoned? Behind the deaths at Wreck Bay, The Age via Gale Academic Onefile
- Firefighting Foams: PFAS vs. Fluorine-Free Foams, FEMA
- “It’s literally killing people”: Thorpe attacks government inaction on forever chemicals in waterways, National Indigenous Times
- There must be something in the water, Minnesota Reformer
- Outspoken PFAS critic Amara Strande dies from cancer, Minnesota Reformer
- She died fighting ‘forever chemicals.’ They still linger in her town, Washington Post
- All The Stuff in Your Home That Might Contain PFAS ‘Forever Chemicals’, Time
- Meaningful and Achievable Steps You Can Take to Reduce Your Risk, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
1 PFAS tends to be a catch-all term for this category of chemicals, but they may also be referred to as PFOA, PFOS, PFNA, and more. This is a sort of square vs. rectangle scenario – as in, a rectangle is always a square, but a square is not necessarily a rectangle. A PFOA may be a PFAS, but a PFAS is not necessarily a PFOA.
2 It’s sometimes called “Teflon fever” because Teflon is a material that is often used for non-stick purposes in heated conditions – like a non-stick frying pan. This is one of the reasons that, if you have any non-stick cookware, it is recommended that you don’t preheat it; the fumes are toxic. “Teflon fever” can refer to illness caused by inhaling fumes from any heated polymer, not just Teflon.
3 In 2020, the International Ski Federation banned waxes containing PFAS in professional races. However, waxes containing PFAS still exist outside of professional skiing, and recreational skiers and snowboarders that use those waxes have a higher risk of PFAS exposure.
4 The primary source of the information in this and the following sections is They Poisoned the World: Life and Death in the Age of Forever Chemicals by investigative journalist Mariah Blake, published by Penguin Random House in 2025.
5 Pressure from chemical industry lobbyists worked on Congress too. Even today, over eighty thousand chemicals circulating in the United States today have never undergone any form of safety testing.
6 Teflon would not have passed safety requirements.
7 PFOA is a type of PFAS.
Green News Archive
Green News You Can Use Archive
Summary
Green News That You Can Use is Green Umbrella’s bi-weekly newsletter packed with climate news from around the Greater Cincinnati region, plus upcoming events and new jobs within the climate sector. Explore our archive to see past issues and sign up here to start receiving new issues of Green News in your inbox every other Wednesday!
Green Umbrella members can submit events and jobs to be included in Green News by logging in through the membership portal.
Check out the previous versions!
Media Tools to Share the Local School Wellness Policy Tool Kit
Local School Wellness Policy Tool Kit Media Tools
Please download, use, and share this powerful resource using our Media Tools.
Summary
In a climate of uncertainty for countless individuals, school districts, school food service operations, and partner organizations, Green Umbrella is excited to share the Local School Wellness Policy Tool Kit as a resource and call to action.
An individual Local School Wellness Policy (LSWP) exists in every school district across the nation that participates in the National School Lunch and Breakfast programs. The LSWP Tool Kit is your guide for galvanizing a whole-school district wellness network by engaging residents, partner organizations, and municipalities in the planning and implementation of a wellness policy. This is a playbook to create a customized school district policy to support nutritious food security, disease prevention, physical activity, environmental stewardship, and mental wellness while creating a culture of care.
The Tool Kit can also guide communities to help determine what legislation and policies are needed at the local level to elevate climate action, provide solutions to a broken food system, and address the health crisis affecting school children. It’s a powerful resource for school district leadership to increase academic performance, improve attendance, and positively impact graduation rates.
Developed by Green Umbrella’s Green Umbrella’s Green Schoolyards Action Network, in partnership with Slow Food USA and Whole Kids, the Tool Kit supports the planning and implementation of effective school wellness policies.
Please share with your networks as a resource in newsletters, on social media, and on your organization's website!
Walk-Through Webinar
Watch a walkthrough of the toolkit from the professionals here and view the slide deck here. For more information, check out this slide deck.
Social Media
Check out the new Local School Wellness Policy Tool Kit!
This powerful resource helps communities across the nation build a district-wide wellness network—by engaging residents, partner organizations, and municipalities in the planning and implementation of school wellness policies.
Developed by Green Umbrella’s Green Umbrella’s Green Schoolyards Action Network, in partnership with Slow Food USA and Whole Kids, this is a playbook to create a customized school district policy to support nutritious food security, disease prevention, physical activity, environmental stewardship, and mental wellness while creating a culture of care.
We’re excited to share this valuable resource with you!
#greenumbrella #greenerschools #schooldistrictwellness
Schedule a Consultation with Green Umbrella Programs
“Disposable”: How Waste Impacts Our Health
Contributors: Nobi Kennedy, Bamidele Osamika, Leah Ross, Mitch Singstock, Kelly St Charles, Van Sullivan, and Viviana Saldarriaga
This piece is a part of Green Umbrella’s 2024 PSA Campaign on climate health impacts, highlighting a recent report completed with Scioto Analysis which was supported in part by bi3, HealthPath, and the Interact for Health Data for Equity grant.
In Greater Cincinnati alone, we send approximately 9,000 tons of trash to the landfill each day. What we discard and how we dispose of it make a big impact on both the climate and community health impacts.
Down in the Dump: Sanitary Landfills in the US

In the United States, the most common type of landfill is called a sanitary landfill. These are waste sites designed to accommodate trash with the intention of preventing hazardous materials byproducts from impacting the surrounding environment. They include containment methods like plastic liners, compacted clay, liquid waste runoff (known as leachate) management, and landfill gas recovery systems.
Although modern landfill design makes intentional effort to limit leaks of leachate and landfill gas, leaks do occur. Poor waste management practices can lead to increased risk of respiratory illnesses, heart disease, stroke, adverse birth effects, infectious disease, and asthma attacks. And because landfills are most often constructed near low-income neighborhoods and communities of color, these are the communities that are hit the hardest by the health impacts of poor waste management.
Health Impacts:
Air Quality
Landfill gas, a byproduct of organic matter decomposition in anaerobic (non-oxygenated) conditions, is extremely dangerous to humans. Landfill gas is composed mostly of two greenhouse gases, methane and carbon dioxide, with varying amounts of nitrogen, ammonia, sulfides, and more. If inhaled, it can cause nausea, coughing, and breathing problems immediately and increase respiratory illness and lung cancer over time.
Recent studies have shown that landfill gas can also contain high levels of Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances, or PFAS. PFAS are synthetic, human-made “forever” chemicals, called such because they do not degrade, but instead build up over time. Exposure to PFAS has been linked to increases in cancer, developmental and birth defects, hormone and endocrine disruption, low fertility rates, asthma and respiratory illnesses, suppressed immunity, and more.
Leachate Contamination
Leachate is a byproduct of the landfill system, created as water (such as rainfall, snowmelt, or runoff) filters through waste in the landfill. The exact composition of leachate varies depending on the landfill contents, but it contains pollutants like heavy metals, pharmaceuticals, “forever chemicals” like PFAS, and ammonia nitrogen compounds. When improperly managed, leachate can contaminate soil, groundwater, and surface water like rivers and lakes. When humans come into contact with these pollutants, they can experience a wide array of negative health outcomes, ranging from skin irritation to antibiotic resistance to cancer and more.
Plastics Everywhere
In landfill conditions, the chemicals in plastics are absorbed into leachate and landfill gas. Across the globe, more than 82 million tons of plastic waste is mismanaged or littered annually, meaning that is not stored in secure landfills, recycled, or incinerated. Of this, 19 million tons of plastic waste escapes into the environment, where it can break down into microplastics that seep into water, soil, and air, to eventually wind up in plants, animals, and humans. Studies have shown that chemicals found in plastics can have major impacts on cancer, diabetes, cardiac health, reproductive health, and the health of newborns and fetuses.
Breaking the Trash Cycle – the Four R’s
Proper and effective waste management practices start with the Four R waste hierarchy: Reduce, Reuse, Recycle, and Refuse.
Reducing waste has some significant environmental impacts, including pollution prevention, reusing existing items, among others. By refusing to create or consume wasteful products, reusing existing items, and viewing our “waste” as valuable resources, our region could radically change our ecological footprint and overall community health.
What YOU Can Do
Compost Food Scraps
An astounding 32% of what goes to Hamilton County’s landfill could be composted. Whether you are able to compost in your own living space or you take advantage of the region’s growing composting infrastructure, composting is a powerful way to make a difference.
Greater Cincinnati is building robust composting infrastructure through community-scale initiatives. Green Umbrella’s The Common Orchard Project, through a USDA Community Composting grant, has established multiple composting sites, including their Camp Washington Perennial Farm facility that can process up to 6,000 pounds of food scraps weekly. The impact is significant—their program’s CO2 reduction equals removing 626 gasoline-powered vehicles from the road annually. Residents can access 24/7 drop-off bins for composting common items like fruits, vegetables, grains, and coffee grounds, turning waste into valuable resources for urban farming.
Practice Safe Disposal
Some items (such as batteries, electronics, light bulbs, needles, paint, and tires) are especially dangerous to throw away. When you need to dispose of these items, research what places and organizations near you accept them for proper disposal. Great resources for local hazardous material disposal include Hamilton County ReSource, Rumpke, and the Indiana Department of Environmental Management (IDEM).
More Actions
- Replace “disposable” items with reusables (washable cloths instead of paper towels and napkins, cutlery and storage containers instead of plastic to-go & take-out items)
- Avoid impulse shopping, fast fashion trends, and single-purpose decor
- Take care to properly recycle glass and metal, which do not break down in landfill conditions but can be easily and effectively recycled
What WE Can Do
While individual actions make communities healthier and safer, the biggest impact comes from the collective action of community leadership, businesses, organizations, and institutions.
Better Waste & Recycling Resources for Your Organization
Organizations like Indiana Recycling Alliance offer education and support for waste reduction initiatives. Northern Kentucky Solid Waste Management Area (NKSWMA) provides resources for proper waste disposal and recycling. The Circular Indiana Initiative promotes sustainable practices and connects residents with reuse opportunities. For electronic waste, Indiana’s IDEM maintains an updated list of certified e-waste collectors to ensure proper recycling of hazardous materials. Hamilton County ReSource offers a Trim Our Waste program to help organizations, institutions and property owners in Hamilton County waste less, recycle properly, and conserve resources.
Fundamental Changes in Policy
Community leadership is imperative to lessen the impacts of excessive waste on our regional climate. Successful waste reduction requires both infrastructure and communication. Communities should ensure convenient access to recycling and composting services, especially in multi-family buildings and public spaces. Local governments can support this through zoning codes that require adequate space for recycling and waste management in new developments.
Several current policy initiatives can drive change at the state and federal levels, such as:
- Right-to-Repair Laws that encourage product longevity, with options to repair the product instead of purchasing a new one
- Product Stewardship Policies that shifts responsibility of a product’s environmental impact to the manufacturer
- The COMPOST Act and Zero Food Waste Act, which prioritizes composting and food waste reduction policies at the federal level
- Pay-As-You-Throw programs that incentivize waste reduction by charging according to the amount of garbage thrown away
Food System Resilience: The Four R’s in Action
According to Maddie Chera, Local Food Specialist for What Chefs Want! and former Director of the Greater Cincinnati Regional Food Policy Council, creating a resilient regional food system requires addressing social, environmental, and economic factors through policy and systems change. Food waste reduction exemplifies how following the waste hierarchy – Reduce, Reuse, Recycle, and Refuse – creates positive ripple effects throughout our community.
The Food Policy Council follows these Four R’s in their work:
- REDUCE: By strengthening local food supply chains to minimize waste during harvest/production and transportation, as well as prevent food spoilage
- REUSE: Through food rescue programs that redirect surplus food to those in need
- RECYCLE: Supporting composting initiatives that turn food waste into valuable soil nutrients
- REFUSE: Unlike metals, plastics, and glass, at every stage of its existence, food can be used for something. Whether conserved, consumed, or composted, food always has a use and should not end up in landfill as refuse.
The Council supports local institutions in adopting policies that prioritize community nutrition while benefiting area businesses. This approach reduces emissions by shortening supply chains and keeps resources within Greater Cincinnati—supporting local farmers, improving food access, and reducing environmental impact.
By integrating these local initiatives and expert perspectives, we can see how waste reduction connects to broader community benefits—from soil health to food security to economic resilience. Whether you choose to start composting, change your own waste habits, or advocate for policy change, every action guided by the Four R’s contributes to a healthier, more sustainable region.
Learn More
Learn more about Waste and climate change by viewing a recording of our latest Climate Health Webinar.
Resources
Infographics – download and share!













