Growing Green: How building up the urban canopy can help Cincinnati create a sustainable, cooler future
By Green Umbrella
Published May 9, 2023
Join us and act against climate change! Become a member today.
The Brent Spence Bridge Corridor project should not move forward without updated environmental studies, according to nearly two dozen local environmental, faith and non-profit leaders.
Source: Cincinnati Enquirer
Brent Spence Bridge project should halt for more environmental study, new coalition says
The Brent Spence Bridge Corridor project should not move forward without updated environmental studies, according to nearly two dozen local environmental, faith and non-profit leaders.
In what could be the first organized opposition to the massive bridge improvement plan, the activists are asking federal highway officials to require Ohio and Kentucky to address what they consider “environmental justice concerns” about the project.
“We think there are some significant public health issues that are not being addressed here,” said Matt Butler, president of Devou Good Foundation and coordinator of the new Coalition for Transit and Sustainable Development of Greater Cincinnati.
In a Jan. 25 letter, the coalition asked the Federal Highway Administration to:
The agency on Tuesday confirmed that it received the coalition’s letter. “A response will be provided following review of the letter,” a spokesperson said.
Butler said Ryan A. Crane, a Cincinnati ear-nose-and-throat doctor, drafted the letter with input from Milwaukee environmental attorney Dennis Grzezinski.
Most of the other 20 coalition members represent communities or causes that will be impacted by the Brent Spence Bridge Corridor project. Among them are the Cincinnati Preservation Association, Price Hill Will and Tri-State Trails.
The group is not anti-progress, Butler said. “We want better solutions for the residents of this area.”
The bridge project – which secured $1.6 billion of its $3.6 billion price tag from federal government sources last year – is advancing with outdated environmental impact studies, the coalition said in its letter.
An earlier “Finding of No Significant Impact” from the Federal Highway Administration is due for re-evaluation this spring, the letter says. The agency first approved the impact study in 2012 and re-evaluated it twice after that, according to the project’s application for federal dollars. The next evaluation should look at air quality issues overlooked before, according to the coalition letter.
“The adverse impact of highway expansion on air quality for minority and low-income communities directly adjacent to the Brent Spence Corridor has not been addressed,” it reads.
The letter is the second bridge initiative of the new group. About six months ago, it launched an online petition calling on local elected leaders to “halt the expansion of the Brent Spence Corridor.”
“Rather than spending billions on an un-aesthetic, unnecessary highway … funding should be shifted to expanding transit options and multi-modal transportation projects,” according to the petition.
The petition had 555 signers as of Tuesday.
Green Umbrella members also have access to our members-only newsletters and e-blasts. Join today to receive these perks!
By Green Umbrella
Published May 9, 2023
By Green Umbrella
Published May 17, 2024